Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Steve Johnson vs Sanam Singh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johnson vs Singh analysis and find out who is favored!
Steve Johnson vs Sanam Singh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Johnson 1 - 0 Singh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johnson has won 54.71% of points on their second serve, while Singh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johnson, in recent form, has won 46.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Singh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.71% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johnson has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Singh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johnson has won 60.71% of matches played (W/L 17/ 11), with Singh winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johnson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 232/ 177), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 54/ 50). Singh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 20/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Johnson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 14/ 5), where as Singh has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Johnson winning 1 times and Singh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Johnson winning 2 and Singh winning 0. The last match between Johnson and Singh was at the USA F23, 12-09-2011, Second, Hard with Steve Johnson getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Johnson and Singh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Johnson winning 0 times and Singh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Johnson winning 0, and Singh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johnson has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.86 while Singh has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johnson has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Singh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johnson has converted 23.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Singh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
256
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
266
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
55% (375-302)
Career Total W/L
62% (208-129)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,178,333
Career Prize Money
$16,251
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Steve Johnson vs Sanam Singh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Johnson VS Singh
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Steve Johnson | Sanam Singh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Steve Johnson | Sanam Singh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (60/64) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 465.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (220/390) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (165/220) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (93/170) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 24% (8/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (127/387) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Steve Johnson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Steve Johnson
60%
(
71 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
126)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
38 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Steve Johnson
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Steve Johnson
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
9
Aces
19
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
17 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Steve Johnson
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Steve Johnson
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Christian Harrison
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Bernard Tomic
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
12
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanam Singh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas S. Hu
Player
Sanam Singh
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas S. Hu
Player
Sanam Singh
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanam Singh
Player
Hao Yuan Ng
53%
(
63 of
120)
1st Serve %
61%
(
83 of
136)
1
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
51 of
83)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
51 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
60 of
136)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(2) 7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sami Reinwein
Player
Sanam Singh
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
49
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanam Singh
Player
Karunuday Singh
50%
(
60 of
120)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
111)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
47%
(
28 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanam Singh
Player
Jui-Chen Hung
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuki Bhambri
Player
Sanam Singh
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanam Singh
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanam Singh
Player
Karunuday Singh
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Sanam Singh
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Johnson Vs Singh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Johnson are available here and Singh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
